<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Segmentation, Content, Reach, Frequency, Engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chirpup.com/2009/08/27/social-media-segmentation-content-reach-frequency-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chirpup.com/2009/08/27/social-media-segmentation-content-reach-frequency-engagement/</link>
	<description>Chicago Interactive Marketing &#38; Social Media Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Marketing ROI Not Snake Oil Mid Size Business Chicago &#124; ChirpUp.com</title>
		<link>http://chirpup.com/2009/08/27/social-media-segmentation-content-reach-frequency-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-6162</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Marketing ROI Not Snake Oil Mid Size Business Chicago &#124; ChirpUp.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chirpup.com/?p=1510#comment-6162</guid>
		<description>[...] are two areas I watch like a hawk for a client, because that&#8217;s where ROI lives. We look at new media metrics in traditional media terms. It’s no less legitimate to consider the number of twitter followers than it is to consider a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are two areas I watch like a hawk for a client, because that&#8217;s where ROI lives. We look at new media metrics in traditional media terms. It’s no less legitimate to consider the number of twitter followers than it is to consider a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Stafford</title>
		<link>http://chirpup.com/2009/08/27/social-media-segmentation-content-reach-frequency-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-4616</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Stafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chirpup.com/?p=1510#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>I have trouble with using the word &#039;campaign&#039; to outline SM activities. Social Media, imo, cannot be campaign-based. It can have activity spikes, sure, but I fear that one-shot, one-purpose campaigns actually leave negative engagement in their wake. Users feel, well, used!

Like Brian says, Social Media is a long-term relationship and needs very long-term overarching goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have trouble with using the word &#8216;campaign&#8217; to outline SM activities. Social Media, imo, cannot be campaign-based. It can have activity spikes, sure, but I fear that one-shot, one-purpose campaigns actually leave negative engagement in their wake. Users feel, well, used!</p>
<p>Like Brian says, Social Media is a long-term relationship and needs very long-term overarching goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Bell</title>
		<link>http://chirpup.com/2009/08/27/social-media-segmentation-content-reach-frequency-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chirpup.com/?p=1510#comment-3536</guid>
		<description>Traditional media is not dead! Nor is the concept of reaching people with a message. That&#039;s what media is, right; making something known and creating a conversation or soliciting a response from people? 

Social media is just a matter of changing the tone, the approach and the content of your message, focusing more on building relationships with people, talking with them instead of to them, responding to engagement with your brand and empowering existing advocates to become third-party validators. 

The same concepts apply. Great post Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional media is not dead! Nor is the concept of reaching people with a message. That&#8217;s what media is, right; making something known and creating a conversation or soliciting a response from people? </p>
<p>Social media is just a matter of changing the tone, the approach and the content of your message, focusing more on building relationships with people, talking with them instead of to them, responding to engagement with your brand and empowering existing advocates to become third-party validators. </p>
<p>The same concepts apply. Great post Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus@VerticPortals</title>
		<link>http://chirpup.com/2009/08/27/social-media-segmentation-content-reach-frequency-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus@VerticPortals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chirpup.com/?p=1510#comment-3424</guid>
		<description>Good little reminder that good old terms can also be applied to emerging media/technology. Something to remember so we don&#039;t create one more IT bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good little reminder that good old terms can also be applied to emerging media/technology. Something to remember so we don&#8217;t create one more IT bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

